Ranking Journals Following a Matching Model Approach. An Application to Public Economics Journals
نویسنده
چکیده
Journal rankings based on citation indexes are widely used in the economics field for global top journals. We propose an alternative way to rank journals based on the publishing behavior of top ranked authors. We justify this approach by depicting the scientific publishing market as following a matching process. Compared to the citation approach, the methodology that we propose has comparative advantages in terms of time effort to produce national and subdiscipline rankings, and it makes it possible to compare them with global rankings. It also corrects the impact underestimation that the citation approach tends to produce in new and re-founded journals. We propose an empirical application to the case of public economics journals. Francesc Pujol Universidad de Navarra Department of Economics Campus Universitario E-31080 Pamplona [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Evaluating Journals in Environmental Economics: A TOP-Curve Approach
In this paper, we use an alternative measure of scholarly quality, namely TOP-curves in order to rank journals in the field of environmental and resource economics. This measure summarizes the journals’ highly cited articles’ incidence, intensity and inequality. Moreover, TOP-curves allow analysts to rank journals according to TOPdominance. If such a ranking is impossible, the area below the cu...
متن کاملA Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields
This paper presents an update of the ranking of economics journals by the invariant method, as introduced by Palacio-Huerta and Volij, with a broader sample of journals. By comparison with the two other most prominent rankings, it also proposes a list of ‘target journals’, ranked according to their quality, as a standard for the field of economics. JEL classification: A12, A14.
متن کاملRanking Law Journals and the Limits of Journal Citation Reports
Rankings of schools, scholars, and journals emphasize ordinal rank. Journal rankings published by Journal Citation Reports (JCR) are widely used to assess research quality, which influences important decisions by academic departments, universities, and countries. We study refereed law journal rankings by JCR, Washington and Lee Law Library (W&L), and the Australian Research Council (ARC). Both ...
متن کاملRanking Predatory Journals: Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It!
Predatory journals are a well-known issue for scholarly publishing and they are repositories for bogus research. In recent years, the number of predatory journals has risen and it is necessary to present a solution for this challenge. In this paper, we will discuss about a possible ranking of predatory journals. Our ranking approach is based on Beall's criteria for detection of predatory journa...
متن کاملRanking scientific journals via latent class models for polytomous item response data
We propose a strategy for ranking scientific journals starting from a set of available quantitative indicators that represent imperfect measures of the unobservable ‘value’ of the journals of interest. After discretizing the available indicators, we estimate a latent class model for polytomous item response data and use the estimated model to classify each journal. We apply the proposed approac...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006